Fabric Selection, Inc. v. Benedict's Goods, LLC et al
| Fabric Selection, Inc. |
| Benedict's Goods, LLC doing business as Amaryllis Apparel, Zulily, LLC, DOES 1 through 10 and Benedict's Goods, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Amaryllis Apparel |
| 2:2023cv07168 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| John F Walter |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 DECLARATION of Morgan E. Pietz re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #10 filed by Defendant Zulily, LLC. (Pietz, Morgan) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Zulily, LLC, identifying Zulily Group, LLC. (Pietz, Morgan) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Zulily, LLC.(Pietz, Morgan) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Thomas P. Burke, Jr counsel for Defendant Zulily, LLC. Thomas P. Burke Jr. is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Zulily, LLC. (Burke, Thomas) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Withdrawal of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #18 filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 18 **WITHDRAWN** PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc., upon Defendant Benedict's Goods, LLC served on 10/13/2023, answer due 11/3/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Benedict's Goods, LLC c/o Megan Marchese Smith (Head of Design/Authorized to Accept) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Barrett, Trevor) Modified on 10/20/2023 Per Notice #19 (iv). |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Zulily, LLC answer now due 10/28/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Zulily, LLC.(Attorney Thomas P. Burke, Jr added to party Zulily, LLC(pty:dft))(Burke, Thomas) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Withdrawal of Response #14 filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.to Text Only Scheduling Notice,,, 12 -- Amended (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 14 **WITHDRAWN** RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.to Text Only Scheduling Notice,,, 12 (Barrett, Trevor) Modified on 9/14/2023 Per Notice #16 (iv). |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ENTRY ORDER: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: STANDING ORDERThe Court has reviewed the docket in this action and determined that counsel for Plaintiff has failed to file the Declaration of Lead Counsel required by paragraph 3 of the Courts Standing Order. Accordingly, counsel is ordered to show cause in writing by September 18, 2023 why the Court should not impose sanctions in the amount of $750.00 for violating the Court's Standing Order. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, counsel shall file the required Declaration on or before September 18, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc., upon Defendant Zulily, LLC served on 9/7/2023, answer due 9/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Zulily, LLC c/o Corporation Service Company (Lynanne Gares/Managing Agent) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Barrett, Trevor) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Benedict's Goods, LLC, Does, Zulily, LLC. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc., (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Barrett, Trevor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35954886 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Attorney Trevor William Barrett added to party Fabric Selection, Inc.(pty:pla))(Barrett, Trevor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
