Laureen Clavecilla et al v. Cottage Health et al
| Laureen Clavecilla and Steve Crozier |
| Cottage Health and Meta Platforms, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv07173 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Bacon, Adrian) |
Filing 23
ORDER ON STIPULATION #22 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv)
|
| Filing 22 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration o Elizabeth K. McCloskey, #2 Proposed Order)(McCloskey, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION #20 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT COTTAGE HEALTH TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The deadline for Defendant to file its Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is continued to November 11, 2023. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 11, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Cottage Health. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Straus, Rachel) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney John K Sherk, III counsel for Defendant Cottage Health. Adding John K. Sherk as counsel of record for Defendant Cottage Health for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Cottage Health. (Attorney John K Sherk, III added to party Cottage Health(pty:dft))(Sherk, John) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Rachel Aleeza Straus counsel for Defendant Cottage Health. Adding Rachel A. Straus as counsel of record for Defendant Cottage Health for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Cottage Health. (Attorney Rachel Aleeza Straus added to party Cottage Health(pty:dft))(Straus, Rachel) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier.(Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Laureen Clavecilla(pty:pla), Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Steve Crozier(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Meta Platforms, Inc. answer now due 10/26/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc..(McCloskey, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc., (McCloskey, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Elizabeth K McCloskey on behalf of Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (Attorney Elizabeth K McCloskey added to party Meta Platforms, Inc.(pty:dft))(McCloskey, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier, upon Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. served on 9/7/2023, answer due 9/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Clerk at CSC, Registered Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier, upon Defendant Cottage Health served on 9/7/2023, answer due 9/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Angie Gallagher, Paralegal Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Cottage Health. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier. (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier. (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier, (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier. (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35955167 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Laureen Clavecilla, Steve Crozier. (Attorney Adrian Robert Bacon added to party Laureen Clavecilla(pty:pla), Attorney Adrian Robert Bacon added to party Steve Crozier(pty:pla))(Bacon, Adrian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
