Eitan Harod et al v. Onaxis Franchising Group, LLC et al
| HAROD VENTURES, LLC and EITAN HAROD |
| ONAXIS FRANCHISING GROUP and Onaxis Franchising Group, LLC |
| 2:2023cv07196 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Eitan Harod, Harod Ventures, LLC. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of service)(Ghilezan, Rares) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harod Ventures, LLC, Eitan Harod, upon Defendant Onaxis Franchising Group, LLC served on 9/8/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Agent INCORP SERVICES INC. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Ghilezan, Rares) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harod Ventures, LLC, Eitan Harod, upon Defendant Onaxis Franchising Group, LLC served on 9/5/2023, answer due 11/6/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Stan Daveiga - DFPI. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Stan Daveiga - DFPI. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Ghilezan, Rares) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendant Onaxis Franchising Group, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff EITAN HAROD, HAROD VENTURES, LLC, (Ghilezan, Rares) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION filed by Plaintiffs EITAN HAROD, HAROD VENTURES, LLC re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Ghilezan, Rares) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs EITAN HAROD, HAROD VENTURES, LLC. (Ghilezan, Rares) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35958615 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff HAROD VENTURES, LLC, EITAN HAROD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 to Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 to Complaint, #5 Exhibit 5 to Complaint, #6 Exhibit 6 to Complaint, #7 Exhibit 7 to Complaint, #8 Exhibit 8 to Complaint) (Attorney Rares Michael Ghilezan added to party EITAN HAROD(pty:pla), Attorney Rares Michael Ghilezan added to party HAROD VENTURES, LLC(pty:pla))(Ghilezan, Rares) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
