Anne Heiting v. Uline, Inc. et al
| Anne Heiting |
| Uline, Inc. and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv07288 |
| September 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Uline, Inc., re Sealed Document #17 served on October 25, 2023. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 17 SEALED DOCUMENT (Response to OSC) re Response #14 , Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal,, #16 filed by Defendant Uline, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ULINE, INC.'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEALPORTIONS OF ULINE, INC.S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ANDPORTIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF JAMES CARRINGTON IN SUPPORT #12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Uline's application to file the unredacted version of the Carrington Response Declaration under seal is GRANTED. Uline's application to file the unredacted version of its Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause under seal is GRANTED. (lc)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Uline, Inc., re Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, #13 , Response #14 , APPLICATION to file document Response and Declaration under seal #12 (via U.S. mail per L.R. 5-3.1.2 & 79-5.3 SERVE NON-PUBLIC DOCUMENT) served on October 23, 2023. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Uline, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 13 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Response and Declaration under seal #12 filed by Defendant Uline, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Unredacted Document Response, #3 Unredacted Document Declaration of J. Carrington ISO Response)(Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION to file document Response and Declaration under seal filed by Defendant Uline, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Redacted Document Response to Order to Show Cause, #2 Redacted Document Declaration of J. Carrington ISO Response, #3 Proposed Order)(Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Anne Heitingto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #10 (Tauler, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The parties are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, to be received by the Court no later than October 21, 2023, for why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (specifically, with respect to the amount in controversy). The parties are encouraged to submit evidence of the amount in controversy aspart of their response to this Order. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in a remand without further warning. (lc)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-07288 ODW(BFMx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (bm) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Uline, Inc..(Singh, Jaikaran) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: This action has been assigned to the civil consent calendar of Judge Steve Kim through the Voluntary Consent Program or the Magistrate Judges Direct Assignment Program. (see document for details). (et)
|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Uline, Inc., re Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 Re: Notice of Removal served on September 7, 2023. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Uline, Inc., Does 1 through 25, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Anne Heiting. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/1/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Uline, Inc., (Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Uline, Inc.. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV18117 Receipt No: ACACDC-35974942 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Uline, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jaikaran Singh, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons & Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - State Court Documents, #5 Declaration of James Carrington) (Attorney Jaikaran Singh added to party Uline, Inc.(pty:dft))(Singh, Jaikaran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
