Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. University of California Los Angeles
| Los Angeles Waterkeeper |
| UCLA and University of California Los Angeles |
| 2:2023cv07329 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant University of California Los Angeles. (gk) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Cooper, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint #1 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (gk) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Cooper, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper, (Cooper, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Cooper, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: 1)The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. 2)Notice of Interested Parties is incomplete. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet and No. 2 Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Daniel G Cooper on behalf of Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper (Cooper, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Daniel G Cooper on behalf of Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper (Cooper, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 09/05/2023, receipt number AACDC-35980247), filed by Attorney for Waterkeeper Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Notice Letter), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Daniel G Cooper added to party Los Angeles Waterkeeper(pty:pla))(Cooper, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
