Edward Piken, M.D. v. Banana Boat Products et al
Edward Piken, M.D. |
Banana Boat Products, Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive |
2:2023cv07401 |
September 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Steve Kim |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 to10 days, filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet)(Coriaty, Joseph) |
Filing 11 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 9/28/2023, the Court set a Scheduling Conference #9 . As required by the Court's 9/18/2023 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report, attaching a worksheet (Exhibit A). To date, the worksheet has not been filed. The Scheduling Conference is continued to 11/17/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. The parties shall file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report, attaching the worksheet attached to the Court's 9/18/2023 Order, by no later than 11/3/2023. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7-10, filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC.. (Coriaty, Joseph) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/20/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 11/3/2023 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/30/2023, attached as Exhibit 3. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Edward Piken, M.D. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 7/18/2023, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Joseph R. Coriaty re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Timely Notice of Removal of Action Under 28 U.S.C. Sectiion 1441 filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Coriaty, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC identifying Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Coriaty, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC. (Coriaty, Joseph) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23TRCV02314 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 08/30/2023, receipt number EDS-230830-000-8907), filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Answer to Complaint, #4 Notice to State Court re Removal, #5 A) (Attorney Joseph Robert Coriaty added to party Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC(pty:dft))(Coriaty, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.