Edward Piken, M.D. v. Banana Boat Products et al
Plaintiff: Edward Piken, M.D.
Defendant: Banana Boat Products, Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv07401
Filed: September 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2023 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 to10 days, filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet)(Coriaty, Joseph)
October 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 9/28/2023, the Court set a Scheduling Conference #9 . As required by the Court's 9/18/2023 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report, attaching a worksheet (Exhibit A). To date, the worksheet has not been filed. The Scheduling Conference is continued to 11/17/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. The parties shall file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report, attaching the worksheet attached to the Court's 9/18/2023 Order, by no later than 11/3/2023. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
October 20, 2023 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7-10, filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC.. (Coriaty, Joseph)
September 18, 2023 Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/20/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 11/3/2023 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
September 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
September 11, 2023 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
September 11, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 11, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil)
September 7, 2023 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/30/2023, attached as Exhibit 3. (jtil)
September 7, 2023 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Edward Piken, M.D. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 7/18/2023, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
September 7, 2023 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Joseph R. Coriaty re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Timely Notice of Removal of Action Under 28 U.S.C. Sectiion 1441 filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Coriaty, Joseph)
September 7, 2023 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC identifying Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Coriaty, Joseph)
September 7, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC. (Coriaty, Joseph)
September 7, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23TRCV02314 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 08/30/2023, receipt number EDS-230830-000-8907), filed by Defendant Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Answer to Complaint, #4 Notice to State Court re Removal, #5 A) (Attorney Joseph Robert Coriaty added to party Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC(pty:dft))(Coriaty, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edward Piken, M.D. v. Banana Boat Products et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Piken, M.D.
Represented By: Richard Devirian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Banana Boat Products
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC
Represented By: Joseph Robert Coriaty
Represented By: Jennifer Lynn Rediehs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 20 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?