Jovan Quiroz Cervantes v. MNRO Holdings, LLC et al
Jovan Quiroz Cervantes |
MNRO Holdings, LLC, MONRO, Inc., Michael Soares and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2023cv07445 |
September 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Wesley L Hsu |
Rozella A Oliver |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Preparation for Settlement Conference by Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. This matter has been referred to the Court for settlement. In preparation for the settlement conference, the Court will hold a counsel-only (no parties) pre-settlement conference by video on Thursday, November 29, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. The log-in information will be emailed to counsel. The settlement conference will be scheduled following the conference. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (tsn) |
Filing 22 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REFERRING SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHANIE CHRISTENSEN by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: Settlement conference proceedings are referred to Magistrate Judge Christensen. All other matters shall remain with Magistrate Judge Oliver. The parties shall complete the settlement conference no later than 08/16/2024. The parties are ordered to have a representative with authority to make final decisions as to this matter present at the settlement conference and to comply with all orders issued by Judge Christensen with respect to the settlement conference process. If a settlement is reached, the parties are ordered to file a notice of settlement with a proposed date by which the matter will be dismissed within 7 days of completing Settlement proceedings.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 21 STANDING ORDER FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 20 CIVIL PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The pretrial schedule governing this case is set forth in the far right column labeled "Court Order" located on the parties' Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet, which accompanies this Order. If the parties wish to set additional or alternative dates, they must file a stipulation and proposed order setting forth the dates requested and demonstrating good cause. Setting additional or alternative dates may be especially appropriate in class actions, patent cases, or cases for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). Please refer to the Court's Standing Order for Newly Assigned Civil Cases for requirements for specific motions, discovery, certain types of filings, courtesy copies, emailing signature items to chambers, settlement, and other matters pertaining to all civil cases. Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet: Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/20/2024 03:00 PM; Jury Trial set for 10/8/2024 09:00 AM. See order for additional deadlines and information. (lom) |
Filing 19 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Christensen for Settlement Conference. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/16/2024. (hc) |
Filing 18 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The matter is called, and counsel stated their appearances. The Court adopts the Joint 26(f) report. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) The Court discusses Settlement proceedings. The Court will contact a Magistrate Judge regarding conducting settlement proceedings. Court Reporter: Maria Bustillos. (bm) |
Filing 17 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER ADVANCING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. #12 ) by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, advances the Scheduling Conference from 1:30 pm to 10/13/23 at 9:30 a.m. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant MONRO, Inc..(Attorney Allison V. Saunders added to party MONRO, Inc.(pty:dft))(Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MONRO, Inc. answer now due 10/6/2023, filed by Defendant MONRO, Inc..(Attorney Caleb Yongkwon Lee added to party MONRO, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lee, Caleb) |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial and Trial Dates Scheduling Worksheet)(Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC, re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #10 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #11 served on 09/11/2023. (Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. A Scheduling Conference is set for 10/13/2023 at 01:00 PM. See Attached Order for Details. (hc) |
Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE WESLEY L. HSU. See Attached Order for Details. (hc) |
Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Rozella A. Oliver. New Case Number 2:23-cv-07445 WLH (RAOx). (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, MNRO Holdings, LLC, MONRO, Inc., Michael Soares. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Jovan Quiroz Cervantes.[FILED IN STATE COURT 07/31/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT 08/31/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC, identifying Monro, Inc., Michael Soares, Jovan Quiroz Cervantes, BlackRock, Inc., The Vanguard Group, T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.. (Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Stacie Bortle re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC. (Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Roberto Ruiz re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC. (Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Caleb Y. Lee re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC. (Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC. (Saunders, Allison) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV17950 Receipt No: ACACDC-35978439 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant MNRO Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Answer, #3 Proof of Service of Summons - MNRO Holdings, LLC) (Attorney Allison V. Saunders added to party MNRO Holdings, LLC(pty:dft))(Saunders, Allison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.