Yang Zhao v. David Meale et al
Yang Zhao |
David Meale and Antony Blinken |
2:2023cv07446 |
September 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yang Zhao, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 10/11/2023, answer due 12/11/2023; David Meale served on 10/11/2023, answer due 12/11/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Flavia De La Orisa, Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Marrick Garland, Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Antony Blinken, Secretary of the U.S. Department of State. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jason Kyle Zubata on behalf of Defendants Antony Blinken, David Meale (Attorney Jason Kyle Zubata added to party Antony Blinken(pty:dft), Attorney Jason Kyle Zubata added to party David Meale(pty:dft))(Zubata, Jason) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Antony Blinken, David Meale (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Antony Blinken(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party David Meale(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Antony Blinken, David Meale. (iv) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 filed by Plaintiff Yang Zhao. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Yang Zhao. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yang Zhao, (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yang Zhao. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Injunctive Relief Receipt No: ACACDC-36001268 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Yang Zhao. (Attorney Joshua L. Goldstein added to party Yang Zhao(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.