California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. Flo Services USA et al
| California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute |
| Flo Services USA, Aetna Life Insurance Company, DOES 1-10, Doe and Does 2-10 |
| 2:2023cv07473 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice Confirming Notification to State Court of Removal to Federal Court filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company. (Ernster, Shannon) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute, upon Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 7/31/2023, answer due 8/21/2023. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Shannon Ernster, Attorney for Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT F) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to Flo Services USA without prejudice filed by plaintiff California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/10/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT amending Complaint - (Discovery), plaintiff being ignorant of the true name of the defendant and having designated the defendant in the complaint by the fictitious name of DOE 1 and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be Aetna Life Insurance Co., filed by plaintiff California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/31/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Flo Services USA amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/27/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Flo Services USA. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/5/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company, identifying Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant; Aetna, Inc., parent of Aetna Life Insurance Company; CVS, ultimate parent of Aetna, Inc.; California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute, Plaintiff; and Adebukola A. Onibokun, M.D., principal of Plaintiff. (Attorney Courtney C Hill added to party Aetna Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Hill, Courtney) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company. (Ernster, Shannon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV07654 Receipt No: ACACDC-36005151 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration In Support of Removal) (Attorney Shannon Lissa Ernster added to party Aetna Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Ernster, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
