Bin Cai v. Susan Curda
| Bin Cai |
| USCIS and Susan Curda |
| 2:2023cv07490 |
| September 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Bin Cai. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel and/or the parties are advised that the Court has updated its procedures in civil cases, including procedures encouraging consent to the magistrate judge in ordinary civil cases; setting forth presumptive schedules for class certification motion briefing; simplifying the requirements for substituting named defendants for Doe defendants; clarifying requirements for submission of mandatory chambers copies of voluminous exhibits; substituting compliance with the Local Rule regarding limitations on the number of words in the parties briefing for the Courts previous page limitations on briefing; imposing further limitations on the number of words in reply briefs; updating the Courts procedures in the case of settlement, including procedures for orders imposing stays of proceedings, orders of dismissal, and retention of jurisdiction by the Court; imposing limitations on both the number of and the content of motions in limine; and clarifying trial exhibit preparation, including the requirement to prepare a separate binder of exhibits for each witness. These updates are found on the Courts procedures page, and/or the Courts Initial Standing Order and Civil Trial Order, attached thereto. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendant Susan Curda (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Susan Curda(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bin Cai, upon Defendant Susan Curda served on 9/14/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Crystal Veloz. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Susan Curda. (sh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bin Cai. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bin Cai, (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Bin Cai. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36009229 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Bin Cai. (Attorney Steve Xiao Ming Luan added to party Bin Cai(pty:pla))(Luan, Steve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
