Sandra Kirkman et al v. State of California et al
| Sandra Kirkman, Carlos Alaniz and John Alaniz |
| State of California, Ramon Silva and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv07532 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling Conference set on November 17, 2023. A Scheduling and Case Management Order to issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendants Ramon Silva, State of California.(Reyes, Ashley) |
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiffs Carlos Alaniz, Sandra Kirkman.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Scheduling Worksheet)(Leap, Shannon) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Having considered the parties' Stipulation #10 , the Court continues the Scheduling Conference to 11/17/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from November 3, 2023 to November 10, 2023 filed by Defendants Ramon Silva, State of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Reyes, Ashley) |
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/20/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 11/3/2023 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Ramon Silva, State of California.(Reyes, Ashley) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Ramon Silva, State of California. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Sandra Kirkman, Carlos Alaniz. Filed in State Court on 7/28/2023 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ramon Silva, State of California. (Reyes, Ashley) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Deputy Attorney General Ashley Reyes in Support of Defendants' Notice of Removal re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Ramon Silva, State of California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service)(Reyes, Ashley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23CMCV01174 Receipt No: ACACDC-36015927 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants State of California, Ramon Silva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Proof of Service) (Attorney Ashley Nicole Reyes added to party Ramon Silva(pty:dft), Attorney Ashley Nicole Reyes added to party State of California(pty:dft))(Reyes, Ashley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
