Tomik Simonian et al v. Antony J. Blinken et al
Tomik Simonian and Elnaz Razaghpoor |
Antony J. Blinken, Mora Namdar, Kristina Kvien and Chip Laitinen |
2:2023cv07551 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Josephine L Staton |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Antony J. Blinken, Kristina Kvien, Chip Laitinen, Mora Namdar (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Antony J. Blinken(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Kristina Kvien(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Chip Laitinen(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Mora Namdar(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel and/or the parties are advised that the Court has updated its procedures in civil cases, including procedures encouraging consent to the magistrate judge in ordinary civil cases; setting forth presumptive schedules for class certification motion briefing; simplifying the requirements for substituting named defendants for Doe defendants; clarifying requirements for submission of mandatory chambers copies of voluminous exhibits; substituting compliance with the Local Rule regarding limitations on the number of words in the parties briefing for the Courts previous page limitations on briefing; imposing further limitations on the number of words in reply briefs; updating the Courts procedures in the case of settlement, including procedures for orders imposing stays of proceedings, orders of dismissal, and retention of jurisdiction by the Court; imposing limitations on both the number of and the content of motions in limine; and clarifying trial exhibit preparation, including the requirement to prepare a separate binder of exhibits for each witness. These updates are found on the Courts procedures page, and/or the Courts Initial Standing Order and Civil Trial Order, attached thereto. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Antony J. Blinken, Kristina Kvien, Chip Laitinen, Mora Namdar. (ghap) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Elnaz Razaghpoor, Tomik Simonian. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elnaz Razaghpoor, Tomik Simonian, (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Elnaz Razaghpoor, Tomik Simonian. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36018923 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Tomik Simonian, Elnaz Razaghpoor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit #1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit #2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit #3) (Attorney Shawn Sedaghat added to party Elnaz Razaghpoor(pty:pla), Attorney Shawn Sedaghat added to party Tomik Simonian(pty:pla))(Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.