Maria Garcia v. Sarun, Inc. et al
| Maria Garcia |
| Sarun, Inc. and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv07859 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maria Garcia, upon Defendant Sarun, Inc. served on 11/11/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon EMRITH W. NGOR, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISIDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Garcia's state law claims. The Court therefore DISMISSES the Unruh Act claim, California Disabled Persons Act claim, the California Health and Safety Code, and the negligence claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Maria Garciato Order to Show Cause,, #9 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's website under Judge Frimpong's Procedures and Schedules. Please read the Standing Order carefully. It is the responsibilities of the parties to maintain familiarly with the Standing Order and any future amendments that the Court may issue by periodically checking the Court's website for the operative version of the Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why the Court Should Not Decline to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Plaintiff's State Law Claims by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. The failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim pursuant to 28 USC section 1367(c). (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sarun, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Maria Garcia. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Maria Garcia. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36075502 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Maria Garcia(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
