Xuilan Chen v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Xiulan Chen |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Rosemary Langley Melville |
| 2:2023cv07875 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Rosemary Langley Melville(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA,, #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: The case number is incomplete and missing the judge initials. The complete case number is 2:23-cv-07875-DDP (JCx) In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Xiulan Chen, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 10/10/2023, answer due 12/11/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 10/10/2023, answer due 12/11/2023; Rosemary Langley Melville served on 10/10/2023, answer due 12/11/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central District's website at "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov" for Judge Dean D. Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. See minute order for details. (lom) Modified on 10/8/2023 (lom).
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Xiulan Chen, (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Xiulan Chen. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Xiulan Chen. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36077207 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Xiulan Chen. (Attorney Zhenxiong Fan added to party Xiulan Chen(pty:pla))(Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
