Gerard Christopher Tcheuman Jr. v. Loop Mobility Inc. et al
Gerard Christopher Tcheuman Jr. |
Loop Mobility Inc. and John Henry |
2:2023cv07891 |
September 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Stephanie S Christensen |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting #2 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (rolm) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (jtil) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gerard Christopher Tcheuman Jr. (jtil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Gerard Christopher Tcheuman Jr. against Defendants John Henry, Loop Mobility Inc. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.