Svetlana Grigoryan-Tovmasyan et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
| SVETLANA GRIGORYAN-TOVMASYAN, RUZANNA CHOBANYAN and Svetlana Gigoryan-Tovmasyan |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou |
| 2:2023cv07949 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Merrick B. Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party USCIS(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central District's website at "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov" for Judge Dean D. Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Svetlana Gigoryan-Tovmasyan, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Sassoun Nalbandian (Nalbandian, Sassoun) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 filed by Plaintiffs RUZANNA CHOBANYAN, SVETLANA GRIGORYAN-TOVMASYAN. (Nalbandian, Sassoun) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs RUZANNA CHOBANYAN, SVETLANA GRIGORYAN-TOVMASYAN. (Nalbandian, Sassoun) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Nalbandian, Sassoun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36090467 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs SVETLANA GRIGORYAN-TOVMASYAN, RUZANNA CHOBANYAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I) (Attorney Sassoun A Nalbandian added to party RUZANNA CHOBANYAN(pty:pla), Attorney Sassoun A Nalbandian added to party SVETLANA GRIGORYAN-TOVMASYAN(pty:pla))(Nalbandian, Sassoun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
