Blanca Garcia v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Blanca Garcia
Defendant: Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC and Does 1-100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv08050
Filed: September 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2023 Filing 18 Receipt of Remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court, Van Nuys on 10/31/2023. (lc)
October 25, 2023 Filing 17 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Van Nuys, No. 23VECV03141. (lc)
October 25, 2023 Filing 16 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER REMANDING CASE. The Court ordered Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC to show cause why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (OSC, ECF No. 12.) Defendant filed a response. (Resp., ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff filed a motion to remand questioning the Court's subject-matter jurisdiction. (Mot., ECF No. 14.). The Court deems the motion appropriate for decision withoutoral argument and vacates the November 20 hearing. Defendant has not shown the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the case. Remand is appropriate. The Court denies the motion to remand as moot #14 and remands the case to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 23VECV03141. The Court directs theClerk to effect the remand immediately and close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
October 25, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: ONLY THE ATTACHMENTS to the First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, Van Nuys Courthouse East #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: These documents ( Notice of Appearance and Notice of Interested Party) should have been Separately e-filed under their respective specific events and not submitted as attachments. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
October 23, 2023 Filing 14 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, Van Nuys Courthouse East filed by Plaintiff Blanca Garcia. Motion set for hearing on 11/20/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certification and Notice of interested parties, #2 Supplement Notice of Appearance) (Youabian, Ryan)
October 13, 2023 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wolf, Matthew)
September 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. The Court orders Defendant to show cause why the case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant shall file a written response within 14 days either acknowledging the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction or establishing by a preponderance of evidence that the amount in controversy "more likely than not" exceeds $75,000. Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's response within seven days of its filing. (lc)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
September 27, 2023 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
September 27, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 27, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh)
September 26, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/25/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
September 26, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Blanca Garcia. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/20/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
September 26, 2023 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Jury Demand #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice (Other) #4 served on 9/26/2023. (Wolf, Matthew)
September 26, 2023 Filing 5 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC.. (Wolf, Matthew)
September 26, 2023 Filing 4 Notice of re-filing state court answer filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wolf, Matthew)
September 26, 2023 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC identifying Jaguar Land Rover Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Holdings Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC, which is a subsidiary of TML Holdings Pte. Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Tata Motors Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Wolf, Matthew)
September 26, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Wolf, Matthew)
September 26, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23VECV03141 Receipt No: ACACDC-36109825 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Matthew C. Wolf added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Wolf, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blanca Garcia v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blanca Garcia
Represented By: Ryan Aaron Youabian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Represented By: Matthew C. Wolf
Represented By: Liana Allison Wong
Represented By: Lauren Kennedy VanDenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?