Miguel Esparza v. Lulus Fashion Lounge, LLC
Miguel Esparza, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Miguel Esparza |
LULUS FASHION LOUNGE, LLC, a Delaware entity d/b/a LULUS.COM and Lulus Fashion Lounge, LLC a Delaware entity doing business as LULUS.COM |
2:2023cv08083 |
September 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Karen L Stevenson |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION [DKT. 10] by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The court DISMISSES the action with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Miguel Esparza. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Miguel Esparza. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendant Lulus Fashion Lounge, LLC., filed by Plaintiff Miguel Esparza. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/21/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant LULUS FASHION LOUNGE, LLC, a Delaware entity d/b/a LULUS.COM, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE RE SERVICE OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL served on September 27, 2023. (Mullins, Bradley) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant LULUS FASHION LOUNGE, LLC, a Delaware entity d/b/a LULUS.COM, identifying (1) Defendant: Lulus Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (a public company traded on Nasdaq) indirectly holds 100% of the stock of Lulus Fashion Lounge, LLC; (2) Plaintiff: Miguel Esparza. (Mullins, Bradley) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant LULUS FASHION LOUNGE, LLC, a Delaware entity d/b/a LULUS.COM. (Mullins, Bradley) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, case number 23STCV19903 Receipt No: ACACDC-36118314 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant LULUS FASHION LOUNGE, LLC, a Delaware entity d/b/a LULUS.COM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Summons, #2 Exhibit B: State Court Class Action Complaint, #3 Exhibit C: State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet and Addendum, and Notice of Case Assignment Unlimited Civil Case, #4 Exhibit D: State Court Court Minute Order re Newly Filed Case; Initial Status Conference Order; Certificate of Mailing re Newly Filed Case and Initial Status Conference Order; Joint Stipulation to Continue to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint, and Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond, #5 Declaration of Naomi Beckman-Straus in Support of Lulus Fashion Lounge, LLCs Notice of Removal) (Attorney Bradley J Mullins added to party LULUS FASHION LOUNGE, LLC, a Delaware entity d/b/a LULUS.COM(pty:dft))(Mullins, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.