Setsuko Inobe v. Noriko Hino
Plaintiff: Setsuko Inobe
Defendant: Noriko Hino
Case Number: 2:2023cv08102
Filed: September 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court grants Plaintiff's request for additional time to respond to the Court's order to show cause (OSC) re jurisdiction. Dkt. No. #8 . Plaintiff shall file the response to the OSC re jurisdiction no later than December 1, 2023. Plaintiff should not expect any further extensions to respond and is reminded that failure to timely respond will be construed as acknowledgement that the Court lacks jurisdiction and as consent to dismissal without prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Setsuko Inobe, re REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Response to Order to Show Cause #13 served on 11/14/2023. (rolm)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Response to Order to Show Cause filed by plaintiff Setsuko Inobe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (rolm)
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court grants Plaintiff's request for an additional 14 days to respond to the Court's order to show cause (OSC) re jurisdiction. Dkt. No. #8 . The Court will consider Plaintiff's request for counsel, Dkt. No. #7 , only after the Court is satisfied that it has subject matter jurisdiction. In the meantime, Plaintiff shall file the response to the OSC re jurisdiction by no later than November 15, 2023. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely respond to the OSC will be construed as acknowledgment that the Court lacks jurisdiction and as consent to dismissal without prejudice, and the Court shall dismiss this action without prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REQUEST for Extension filed by Plaintiff Setsuko Inobe. (gk)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: granting #9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (rolm)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Setsuko Inobe. (rolm)
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JURISDICTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff is therefore ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than 10/20/2023 at 9:00 AM, why the Court has jurisdiction over this case. Failure to timely comply may be deemed as a concession that this Court lacks jurisdiction and may result in dismissal of the case. See document for further details. (gk)
October 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel filed by Plaintiff Setsuko Inobe. (gk)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil)
September 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Setsuko Inobe. (jtil)
September 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Setsuko Inobe against Defendant Noriko Hino. Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Setsuko Inobe v. Noriko Hino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Setsuko Inobe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noriko Hino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?