M.F.A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| M.F.A. |
| Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC.,, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Raiser, LLC and Does 1 through 50 Inclusive |
| 2:2023cv08115 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Alka Sagar |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from California Northern District, 3:23-cv-05560 filed 10/27/2023. (rolm) |
| Filing 12 Conditional Transfer Order - 2 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3084, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of California and assigned to Honorable Charles R. Breyer. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff M.F.A., upon Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. served on 10/6/2023, answer due 10/27/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent by serving John Montijo - Process Specialist & Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (London, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff M.F.A., upon Defendant Raiser, LLC served on 10/6/2023, answer due 10/27/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent by serving John Montijo - Process Specialist & Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (London, Sarah) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff M.F.A.. (London, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff M.F.A., (London, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. In the future please e-file the Summons separately and under the correct event. The Summons has now been issued. (car) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Raiser, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36122456 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff M.F.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Notice of Pendency of Other Proceeding) (Attorney Sarah R London added to party M.F.A.(pty:pla))(London, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
