Ying Wang v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
| Ying Wang |
| USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office |
| 2:2023cv08126 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #10 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant action shall be stayed administratively closed until February 24, 2025. The parties shall file a joint status report on February 24, 2025, if the action has not been dismissed by that date. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Application filed by Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney David Kim added to party USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft))(Kim, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE WESLEY L. HSU. (hc) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ying Wang. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ying Wang, identifying None. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ying Wang. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36125354 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Ying Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chen added to party Ying Wang(pty:pla))(Chen, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ying Wang v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ying Wang | |
| Represented By: | Michael Chen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office | |
| Represented By: | Ernesto Molina |
| Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
| Represented By: | David Kim |
| Represented By: | Oil Appellate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
