Anthony Ray Miller v. Amazon Retail LLC et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant: Amazon Retail LLC and Does 1 through 100 inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv08270
Filed: October 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: A Joel Richlin
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2023 Filing 16 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan (Amended) ; estimated length of trial 5-7 Court Days, filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Matayoshi, Kelly)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Continuing Scheduling Conference and Ordering Counsel to Review Local Procedures by Judge Josephine L. Staton. No later than 12/8/2023, counsel shall file an Amended Joint Rule 26(f) Report with a fully completed Exhibit A. The Court CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference to 1/12/2024 at 10:30 AM. See document for further information. (jp)
December 1, 2023 Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 Cout Days, filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC.. (Matayoshi, Kelly)
November 18, 2023 Filing 13 Notice of Withdrawal of Jt Stipulation to Continue Hearing filed by Miller, Anthony Anthony Ray Miller. (Akopyan, Ani)
November 3, 2023 Filing 12 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from December 15, 2023 to January 15, 2024 filed by Anthony Miller Anthony Ray Miller. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Akopyan, Ani)
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 12/15/2023 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for Details. (gga)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment for Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-08270-JLS (AJRx). (et)
October 5, 2023 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga)
October 4, 2023 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
October 4, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
October 4, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh)
October 3, 2023 Filing 5 (Attorney Ani Markarian Akopyan added to party Anthony Ray Miller(pty:pla))(Akopyan, Ani)
October 2, 2023 CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Amazon Retail LLC, Does Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Anthony Ray Miller. [FILED IN STATE COURT 8/25/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
October 2, 2023 CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT 10/02/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBIT C TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh)
October 2, 2023 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 10/02/2023. (Matayoshi, Kelly)
October 2, 2023 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1) and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC, identifying Indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc.. (Matayoshi, Kelly)
October 2, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC. (Matayoshi, Kelly)
October 2, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV20431 Receipt No: ACACDC-36146978 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Amazon Retail LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kelly M. Matayoshi, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Attorney Kelly M Matayoshi added to party Amazon Retail LLC(pty:dft))(Matayoshi, Kelly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Ray Miller v. Amazon Retail LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Ray Miller
Represented By: Ani Markarian Akopyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon Retail LLC
Represented By: Kelly M Matayoshi
Represented By: Corina Carmen Gallardo
Represented By: Douglas Evans Dexter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?