Christopher McCook v. Kimberley Baker Guillemet et al
| Christopher McCook |
| Kimberley Baker Guillemet, Jessica Field, Douglas Murray, Luke Landsberger, Victor Munoz, Michael Takacs, Rene Arguelles, Scott Paik and Luis Molina |
| 2:2023cv08351 |
| September 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Hernan D Vera |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER OF THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE -OCMJ # 23-150 by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the transfer of cases due to the appointment of a Magistrate Judge to the District Court, this case is transferred from the calendar of Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to the calendar of Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow for all further proceedings authorized by statute, local rules and general orders. All documents subsequently filed shall bear the new case designation 2:23-cv-08351-HDV-DTB absent further order of the Court. (dta)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Victor Munoz. Motion set for hearing on 2/8/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Hernan D. Vera. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Caroline M Park added to party Victor Munoz(pty:dft)) (Park, Caroline) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Kimberley Baker Guillemet. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Lindsay N Frazier-Krane added to party Kimberley Baker Guillemet(pty:dft)) (Frazier-Krane, Lindsay) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Victor Munoz. (et) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Kimberley Baker Guillemet. (et) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Michael Takacs. (et) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Jessica Field. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Rene Arguelles. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Scott Paik. (et) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Luke Landsberger. (et) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Luis Molina. (et) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred) #1 as to Defendant Douglas Murray. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 into the registry of the Court from Christopher Mccook. Re: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . Receipt number Pay.gov Tracking Id: 2784Q726. (ee) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christopher McCook. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Christopher McCook against Defendants Rene Arguelles, Jessica Field, Kimberley Baker Guillemet, Luke Landsberger, Luis Molina, Victor Munoz, Douglas Murray, Scott Paik and Michael Takacs. Case assigned to Judge Hernan D. Vera and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Filing fee $402 Paid) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
