Clarence Graham v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
| Clarence Graham |
| Los Angeles Unified School District and Does 1 to 100 inclusive |
| 2:2023cv08358 |
| October 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/23/2024. (tj)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District.(Sanchez, Henry) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Clarence Graham answer now due 11/15/2023, filed by Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District.(Attorney Henry Lee Sanchez added to party Los Angeles Unified School District(pty:dft))(Sanchez, Henry) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Clarence Graham, upon Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District served on 10/10/2023, answer due 11/9/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Gross, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment(s): # 1 Civil Cover Sheet The document(s) should have been filed separately using their true events. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs.. (sh) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District. (sh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Clarence Graham, (Gross, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Clarence Graham. (Gross, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36162681 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Clarence Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Joseph Abraham Gross added to party Clarence Graham(pty:pla))(Gross, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
