Marionna Naomi Latrice Ackles v. Brinker Restaurant Corporation et al
MARIONNA NAOMI LATRICE ACKLES, and individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Marionna Naomi Latrice Ackles |
BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION, SHANE SOWERS, DOES 1 through 100 and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
2:2023cv08463 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M Olguin |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DECLARATION of MICHAEL D. THOMAS re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION. (Thomas, Michael) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 DEFENDANT BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATIONS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT [FRCP 7.1] filed by Defendant BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION (Thomas, Michael) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION, (Thomas, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION. (Thomas, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Receipt No: BCACDC-36181454 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION. (Attorney Michael D. Thomas added to party BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Thomas, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.