Constance Parker v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
| CONSTANCE PARKER |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 2:2023cv08527 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, identifying The Prudential Insurance Company of America; Prudential Financial, Inc.. (Attorney Jonathan H. Semerjian added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Semerjian, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(James, Jason) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America of Prudential's Administrative Record. (James, Jason) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF LODGING filed (and Service) of Administrative Record re Order #12 (James, Jason) |
Filing 12
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See order for case deadlines and requirements imposed.* (vdr)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America answer now due 12/8/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(Attorney Jason A James added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(James, Jason) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Constance Parker, upon Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 10/19/2023, answer due 11/9/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarai Marin, Intake Specialist of C.T. Corporation - Agent for Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff CONSTANCE PARKER. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CONSTANCE PARKER, (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff CONSTANCE PARKER. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36189013 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff CONSTANCE PARKER. (Attorney Phillip S Bather added to party CONSTANCE PARKER(pty:pla))(Bather, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
