National Technical Systems v. Arrowood Indemnity Company
National Technical Systems |
Arrowood Indemnity Company and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2023cv08612 |
October 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Hernan D Vera |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Hernan D. Vera: Please be advised the Scheduling Conference is reset to 06/20/24 at 10am.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION FOR 180 DAYS ON ACCOUNT OF LIQUIDATION AND INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST SOLE NAMED DEFENDANT ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY by Judge Hernan D. Vera. 1. This action, including the December 19, 2023 scheduling conference and all other deadlines, is hereby stayed for 180 days. 2. On expiration of this stay, NTS and Arrowood shall file a joint report with their respective positions regarding whether and how this action should proceed. (lom) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Harrison, Brian) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Hernan D. Vera. Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2023 at 10:00 AM. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 Arrowood Indemnity Company's Answer to National Technical System's Complaint filed by Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company.(Harrison, Brian) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff National Technical Systems in Los Angeles Superior Court on 9/11/2023, attached as Exhibit 6. (jtil) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company identifying Arrowood Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Harrison, Brian) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Harrison, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Receipt No: ACACDC-36211193 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian D. Harrison, #2 Exhibit 1 to Harrison Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Harrison Declaration, #4 Exhibit 3 to Harrison Declaration, #5 Exhibit 4 to Harrison Declaration, #6 Exhibit 5 to Harrison Declaration, #7 Exhibit 6 to Harrison Declaration, #8 Exhibit 7 to Harrison Declaration, #9 Exhibit 8 to Harrison Declaration, #10 Exhibit 9 to Harrison Declaration, #11 Exhibit 10 to Harrison Declaration, #12 Exhibit 11 to Harrison Declaration, #13 Exhibit 12 to Harrison Declaration, #14 Exhibit 13 to Harrison Declaration, #15 Exhibit 14 to Harrison Declaration, #16 Exhibit 15 to Harrison Declaration, #17 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Brian D Harrison added to party Arrowood Indemnity Company(pty:dft))(Harrison, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.