Marco Caravaggio v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
Marco Caravaggio |
Los Angeles Unified School District and Does 1 to 100, inclusive |
2:2023cv08706 |
October 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margo A Rocconi |
Josephine L Staton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Marco Caravaggio. (Gross, Joseph) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marco Caravaggio, (Gross, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marco Caravaggio. (Gross, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36230430 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Marco Caravaggio. (Attorney Joseph Abraham Gross added to party Marco Caravaggio(pty:pla))(Gross, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.