Marina Akrabian v. Veripro Solutions et al
Marina Akrabian |
ZBS Law, LLP, Veripro Solutions, West Coast Servicing Inc., West Coast 2015-4LLC, Nationstar Mortgage and John and Jane Does |
2:2023cv08709 |
October 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 28-DAY EXTENSION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The CourtGRANTS Plaintiff's motion for a 28-day extension of time in which to respond to the Court's order to show cause, including by filing an amended complaint #9 . Akrabian shall have until 12/22/2023 to file her amended complaint and to comply with the Court's 11/2/2023 Order. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 11 AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Extension of Time for Courts Order to Show Cause Entered Sua Sponte on 11/2/2023 filed by Plaintiff Marina Akrabian. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (gk) |
Filing 9 MOTION for 28 Day Extension of Time Fully to Respond to this Court's Premature Order to Show Cause Entered Sua Sponte on 11/2/2023 filed by Plaintiff Marina Akrabian. (gk) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bradford E Klein on behalf of Defendants West Coast 2015-4LLC, West Coast Servicing Inc., ZBS Law, LLP (Attorney Bradford E Klein added to party West Coast 2015-4LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Bradford E Klein added to party West Coast Servicing Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Bradford E Klein added to party ZBS Law, LLP(pty:dft))(Klein, Bradford) |
Filing 7 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OR REFERRED TO THE BANKRUPTCY COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Since the Complaint does not adequately specify the basis for the Court's jurisdiction, Akrabian is therefore ORDERED to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or referred to the Bankruptcy Court. By 11/17/2023, Akrabian shall file a response in which she properly identifies the basis of subject matter jurisdiction, if any, and explains why this case should not be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 157. Failure to timely respond, or failure to adequately support the basis for this Court's jurisdiction, will result in the dismissal of this action. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marina Akrabian. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants John and Jane Does, Veripro Solutions, West Coast 2015-4LLC, West Coast Servicing Inc., ZBS Law, LLP. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Filing fee $ 402 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Marina Akrabian. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.