Moreo Rosser v. Federal Express Corporation et al
Moreo Rosser |
Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Corporation and Does 2 through 50 inclusive |
2:2023cv08788 |
October 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Stephen V Wilson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation identifying FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Flynn, Jane) |
Filing 4 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation, identifying FedEx Corporation. (Flynn, Jane) |
Filing 3 Notice Of No Related Cases And No Pendency of Other Actions filed by defendant Federal Express Corporation. (Flynn, Jane) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation. (Flynn, Jane) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23TRCV01155 Receipt No: ACACDC-36248006 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Federal Express Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration Jane Flynn, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Declaration Gabriel Hernandez, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Declaration Shahram Eslami) (Attorney Jane M Flynn added to party Federal Express Corporation(pty:dft))(Flynn, Jane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.