Lisa Fitzgerald v. Hanesbrands, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Lisa Fitzgerald
Defendant: Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Hanesbrands, Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as Bras N Things
Case Number: 2:2023cv08875
Filed: October 20, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Filing 17 Receipt of LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT. (aco)
October 25, 2023 Filing 16 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (aco)
October 25, 2023 Filing 15 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge Percy Anderson. The Court having waived Local Rule 6-1 barring oral motions, Plaintiff's counsel moved to remand the action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court based on Defendant's failure to adequately allege a basis for the Court's subject matter jurisdiction in the Notice of Removal. The Court grants Plaintif's Motion to Remand. Accordingly, this action is hereby remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number 23STCV22394, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See document for further details). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Debbie Spaan. (aco)
October 25, 2023 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Hanesbrands, Inc., re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only, #13 served on 10/25/2023. (Hammond, Brooke)
October 25, 2023 Filing 11 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Percy Anderson Status Conference by ZOOM is set for 10/25/2023 at 12:00 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
October 24, 2023 Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for December 18, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. This action has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Percy Anderson. (See document for further details). (aco)
October 24, 2023 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Hanesbrands, Inc., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #9 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #8 served on 10/24/2023. (Wilson, Elizabeth)
October 23, 2023 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
October 23, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 23, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (car)
October 20, 2023 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Hanesbrands, Inc. Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit F to Notice of Removal #1 .(car)
October 20, 2023 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Lisa Fitzgerald, upon Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. served on 9/20/2023, answer due 10/11/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon United Agent Group Inc. - Ty Chandler - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Filed in State Court on 9/21/2023 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
October 20, 2023 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Hanesbrand, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Lisa Fitzgerald. Filed in State Court on 9/15/2023 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
October 20, 2023 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice (Other) #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on October 20, 2023. (Hammond, Brooke)
October 20, 2023 Filing 5 Notice DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things. (Hammond, Brooke)
October 20, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things, identifying Plaintiff Lisa Fitzgerald; ANGEL CITY LAW, PCCounsel for Plaintiff; Defendant Hanesbrands Inc., DBA Bras N Things (erroneously named Hanesbrand, Inc. DBA Bras N Things); and Littler Mendelson, P.C. Counsel for Defendant. (Hammond, Brooke)
October 20, 2023 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things identifying Defendant HANESBRANDS, INC. DBA BRAS N THINGS hereby discloses the stock of HANESBRANDS, INC. is publicly traded. No publicly-held entity owns 10% or more of the stock of HANESBRANDS, INC. as Corporate Parent. (Hammond, Brooke)
October 20, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things. (Hammond, Brooke)
October 20, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV22394 Receipt No: ACACDC-36267581 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Renee Jones, #2 Declaration of Brooke S. Hammond) (Attorney Brooke S. Hammond added to party Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things(pty:dft))(Hammond, Brooke)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lisa Fitzgerald v. Hanesbrands, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Fitzgerald
Represented By: Ricardo Manuel Martin
Represented By: Ji-Su Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hanesbrand, Inc. dba Bras N Things
Represented By: Brooke S. Hammond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hanesbrands, Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as Bras N Things
Represented By: Brooke S Hammond
Represented By: Elizabeth Staggs Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?