Alina Fedoshchuk v. US Customs and Border Protection et al
| Alina Fedoshchuk |
| United States Customs and Border Protection, Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy A. Miller and Cheryl Davies |
| 2:2023cv08921 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Cheryl Davies, Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy A. Miller, United States Customs and Border Protection. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alina Fedoshchuk. (Tolchin, Stacy) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alina Fedoshchuk. (Tolchin, Stacy) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Tolchin, Stacy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36274884 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Alina Fedoshchuk. (Attorney Stacy Eva Tolchin added to party Alina Fedoshchuk(pty:pla))(Tolchin, Stacy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
