Christine Rogers v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
| Christine Rogers |
| Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Michael P. Santomassimo |
| 2:2023cv08976 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Hernan D Vera |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER IN RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against defendants #17 by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The document is stricken. (rolm)
|
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christine Rogers, upon Defendant in compliance with statute not specified by method of mail and acknowledgment of service. (rolm) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against defendants #17 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: No proof of service/waiver of service on file. The name of the person served does not exactly match the person named in complaint. No Entry of Default on file. The name of the person for which Default Judgment is requested does not exactly match the person named in the complaint. Amount sought is not for a sum certain or cannot be computed to a sum certain. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default judgment reconsidered. No proposed judgment submitted. However complaint based on Fraud, RiCO..not authorized for a clerk to process. If default is process, Filer is to file Separate proper formatted Motion to be set before the Judge.. (lc) |
| Filing 17 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 12/13/23 SEE DOCKET NO. 20] MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT against defendants filed by plaintiff Christine Rogers. (lc) Modified on 12/13/2023 (rolm). |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Plaintiff Christine Rogers. (aco) |
| Filing 15 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Christine Rogers. (aco) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE AND ORDER by Kenly Kiya Kato: in light of the Courts Order striking dkt. #9 from the record, the Courts November 27, 2023 Order to Show Cause is hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 13
ORDER STRIKING FILED DOCUMENTS FROM THE RECORD by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Proof of service lacks signature. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l) ("[P]roof of service must be made to the court... by the server's affidavit.").; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #9 . (aco)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendants for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 6, 2023 to respond to this Order. Plaintiff may discharge this Order to Show Cause by filing a request for entry of default against Defendants. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
|
Filing 11
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: Please refer to the Order for complete details. (cbr)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-133) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, this case is transferred from Judge Hernan D. Vera to the calendar of Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-08976-KK-SSCx. (rn)
|
| Filing 9 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 12/04/2023, SEE DOC NO. 13] PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christine Rogers, upon Defendants Michael P. Santomassimo served on 11/3/2023, answer due 11/24/2023; Wells Fargo Bank N.A. served on 11/3/2023, answer due 11/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon A Aung and not legible in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. (bm) Modified on 12/5/2023 (aco). |
|
Filing 8
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (car) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (car) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Michael P. Santomassimo. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christine Rogers (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Michael P. Santomassimo, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. Case assigned to Judge Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen.(Filing fee $ 402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Christine Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) Modified on 10/26/2023 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
