Benito Acuna Sr. v. Edward Borla
Plaintiff: Benito Acuna
Petitioner: Benito Acuna, Sr.
Respondent: Edward Borla
Case Number: 2:2023cv08988
Filed: October 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: A Joel Richlin
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2023 Filing 5 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION to file document Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under seal #4 filed by Plaintiff Benito Acuna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibt A to Declaration, #2 Unredacted Document, #3 Sealed Exhibits, #4 Proof of Service)(Marquis, Estalyn)
October 24, 2023 Filing 4 EX PARTE APPLICATION to file document Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under seal filed by Plaintiff Benito Acuna. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Marquis, Estalyn)
October 24, 2023 Filing 3 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Filing Under Seal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Exhibits 14, 15, 16, and 39 to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Proposed Order Lodged Concurrently Herewith] filed by Plaintiff Benito Acuna. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Marquis, Estalyn)
October 24, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Benito Acuna. (Marquis, Estalyn)
October 24, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Benito Acuna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit 26, #28 Exhibit 27, #29 Exhibit 28, #30 Exhibit 29, #31 Exhibit 30, #32 Exhibit 31, #33 Exhibit 32, #34 Exhibit 33, #35 Exhibit 34, #36 Exhibit 35, #37 Exhibit 36, #38 Exhibit 37, #39 Exhibit 38, #40 Exhibit 39, #41 Exhibit 40, #42 Exhibit 41) (Attorney Estalyn Smyke Marquis added to party Benito Acuna(pty:pla))(Marquis, Estalyn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benito Acuna Sr. v. Edward Borla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benito Acuna
Represented By: Estalyn Smyke Marquis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Edward Borla
Represented By: Julie Ann Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benito Acuna, Sr.
Represented By: Estalyn Smyke Marquis
Represented By: Cuauhtemoc Ortega
Represented By: Raj N. Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?