Donna Yasmin Lavy v. American Society for Yad Vashem et al
| Donna Yasmin Lavy, an individual and Donna Yasmin Lavy |
| American Society for Yad Vashem, a New York not-for-profit corporation, 1-50, inclusive DOES, American Society for Yad Vashem and Does 1 through 50 inclusive |
| 2:2023cv09038 |
| October 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant American Society for Yad Vashem, a New York not-for-profit corporation, (Mervis, Laine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant American Society for Yad Vashem, a New York not-for-profit corporation. (Mervis, Laine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV21518 Receipt No: ACACDC-36297901 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant American Society for Yad Vashem, a New York not-for-profit corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Laine Mervis added to party American Society for Yad Vashem, a New York not-for-profit corporation(pty:dft))(Mervis, Laine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
