Fortify Property Management, Inc. v. LeRoi Davis et al
| Fortify Property Management, Inc. |
| LeRoi Davis, Glen Low and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv09235 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lfa)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Glen Low. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Glen Low (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of Los Angeles, case number 23STUD09113 with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. Filing fee $402 Fee Due, filed by Defendant Glen Low. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
