Kenneth Emanuel Baptiste v. G. Mattison
| Kenneth E. Baptiste |
| G. Mattison |
| 2:2023cv09280 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner GRANTING REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee with Declaration in Support #2 . (jp)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF LODGING filed IN 28 U.S.C. 2254 HABEAS CORPUS CASE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Memorandum of Points and Authorities #10 (Attachments: #1 LD 1-GA027432 Criminal Reg. Docket. 11.27.23 80 pgs., #2 LD 2-B154338 OPIN. 6.23.03., #3 LD 3-S117942 Docket, #4 LD 4-B327788 PET HC 4.12.23., #5 LD 5-B327788 DEN ORD 5.25.23., #6 LD 6-S280447 PET HC 6.9.23., #7 LD 7-S280447 PET HC. Docket. 11.21.23., #8 LD 8-S280736 PET HC 6.26.23., #9 LD 9-S280736 PET HC. Docket.11.17.23.)(Inberg, Kristen) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Respondent G. Mattison. (Inberg, Kristen) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Kenneth E. Baptiste. (et) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE - OCMJ# 23-157 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the Creation of Calendar of Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow, this case is transferred from the calendar of Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to the calendar of Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow for all further proceedings authorized by statute, local rules and general orders. All documents subsequently filed shall bear this new case designation 2:23-cv-09280 RGK(DTB) absent further order of the Court. (rn)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Kristen J. Inberg on behalf of Respondent G. Mattison. (Attorney Kristen Joy Inberg added to party G. Mattison(pty:res))(Inberg, Kristen) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Respondent should file and serve an answer to the Petition within 45 days of the date of this Order Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 12/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Attachment 2 CV-11B) (et)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge - DECLINED by Party #3 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): Petitioner did not check a box on Election Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lh) |
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Neither Decline nor Consent, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Kenneth E. Baptiste. The Petitioner does not consent nor decline. (lh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Kenneth E. Baptiste. (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Kenneth E. Baptiste. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kenneth Emanuel Baptiste v. G. Mattison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth E. Baptiste | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: G. Mattison | |
| Represented By: | Kristen Joy Inberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
