Nike, Inc. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff: Nike, Inc.
Defendant: Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv09346
Filed: November 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SKECHERS U.S.A., INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court APPROVES the parties' Stipulation #31 and EXTENDS Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.'s deadline to respond to the Complaint to 1/12/2024. (gk)
November 28, 2023 Filing 32 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Skechers U.S.A., Inc. answer now due 12/28/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc..(Lu, Samuel)
November 20, 2023 Filing 31 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 12, 2024 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lu, Samuel)
November 20, 2023 Filing 30 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc., (Lu, Samuel)
November 16, 2023 Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Keith Andrew Orso counsel for Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. Adding Keith A. Orso as counsel of record for Skechers U.S.A., Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. (Attorney Keith Andrew Orso added to party Skechers U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Orso, Keith)
November 16, 2023 Filing 28 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Morgan Chu counsel for Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. Adding Morgan Chu as counsel of record for Skechers U.S.A., Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. (Attorney Morgan Chu added to party Skechers U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Chu, Morgan)
November 16, 2023 Filing 27 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Thomas C Werner counsel for Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. Adding Thomas C. Werner as counsel of record for Skechers U.S.A., Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. (Attorney Thomas C Werner added to party Skechers U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Werner, Thomas)
November 16, 2023 Filing 26 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Samuel K Lu counsel for Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. Adding Samuel K. Lu as counsel of record for Skechers U.S.A., Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. (Attorney Samuel K Lu added to party Skechers U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Lu, Samuel)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher J. Renk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc., designating Michael Sebba as local counsel #16 . (gk)
November 13, 2023 Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc., upon Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc. served on 11/7/2023, answer due 11/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ted Weitxman - Associate General Counsel in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy (Sebba, Michael)
November 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Hilda A. Obeng to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc., designating Michael Sebba as local counsel #21 . (gk)
November 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Harris to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc., designating Michael Sebba as local counsel #17 . (gk)
November 8, 2023 Filing 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hilda A. Obeng to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36374132) filed by plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sebba, Michael)
November 8, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Harris to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36364850) #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number incomplete; missing initials of Judge. (ak)
November 8, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher J. Renk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36364636) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number incomplete; missing initials of Judge. (ak)
November 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
November 7, 2023 Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Harris to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36364850) filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Michael J. Harris added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:pla)) (Harris, Michael)
November 7, 2023 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher J. Renk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36364636) filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Christopher J. Renk added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:pla)) (Renk, Christopher)
November 7, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Harris on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
November 7, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Christopher J. Renk on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
November 7, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Hilda Obeng on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
November 7, 2023 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (et)
November 7, 2023 Filing 11 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
November 7, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
November 7, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et)
November 6, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bridgette Gershoni on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Attorney Bridgette Gershoni added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:pla))(Gershoni, Bridgette)
November 6, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael Joshua Gershoni on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Attorney Michael Joshua Gershoni added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:pla))(Gershoni, Michael)
November 6, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael Jonathan Sebba on behalf of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Sebba, Michael)
November 6, 2023 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Nike, Inc.. (Sebba, Michael)
November 6, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc., identifying NIKE, Inc.. (Sebba, Michael)
November 6, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Sebba, Michael)
November 6, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc.. (Sebba, Michael)
November 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 11/06/2023, receipt number ACACDC-36355587), filed by Plaintff Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12) (Attorney Michael Jonathan Sebba added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:pla))(Sebba, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nike, Inc. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nike, Inc.
Represented By: Bridgette Gershoni
Represented By: Michael Joshua Gershoni
Represented By: Michael Jonathan Sebba
Represented By: Christopher J. Renk
Represented By: Michael J. Harris
Represented By: Hilda A. Obeng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Morgan Chu
Represented By: Keith Andrew Orso
Represented By: Samuel K Lu
Represented By: Thomas C Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?