Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Jotform Inc. et al
| Minden Pictures, Inc. |
| Jotform Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv09396 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 1/29/2024 filed by Defendant Jotform Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Carol Yur, #2 Proposed Order)(Yur, Carol) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central District's website at "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov" for Judge Dean D. Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jotform Inc. answer now due 12/29/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Jotform Inc..(Attorney Carol Yur added to party Jotform Inc.(pty:dft))(Yur, Carol) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc., upon Defendant Jotform Inc. served on 11/8/2023, answer due 11/29/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jotform, Inc. c/o Matt Romand (Receptionist/Authorized to Accept) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jotform Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc., (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36367346 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Attorney Stephen M. Doniger added to party Minden Pictures, Inc.(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
