Williams International Co., LLC v. Ducommun Incorporated et al
Williams International Co., LLC |
Ducommun Incorporated, Ducommun Aerostructures, Inc. and Ducommun Aerostructures Mexico, LLC |
2:2023cv09403 |
November 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
A Joel Richlin |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: This matter has been assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's website under Judge Frimpong's Procedures and Schedules. Please read the Standing Order carefully. It is the responsibilities of the parties to maintain familiarly with the Standing Order and any future amendments that the Court may issue by periodically checking the Court's website for the operative version of the Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney E. Powell Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36450793) #13 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eric James Minch to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36446523) #12 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Marc L. Newman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36450870) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Superseded version of Form G-64 used. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District for the practice of law, in which the attorney is physically present on a regular basis to conduct business. (sbou) |
Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Marc L. Newman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36450870) filed by plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shea, Cristina) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney E. Powell Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36450793) filed by plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shea, Cristina) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eric James Minch to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36446523) filed by plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shea, Cristina) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC, upon Defendant Ducommun Aerostructures Mexico, LLC served on 11/13/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sam Ellis, receptionist/authorized employee, URS AGENTS INC., AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Weiss, David) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC, upon Defendant Ducommun Aerostructures, Inc. served on 11/13/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sam Ellis, receptionist/authorized employee, URS AGENTS INC., AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Weiss, David) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC, upon Defendant Ducommun Incorporated served on 11/13/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sam Ellis, receptionist/authorized employee, URS AGENTS INC., AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Weiss, David) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ducommun Aerostructures Mexico, LLC, Ducommun Aerostructures, Inc., Ducommun Incorporated. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC, (Weiss, David) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC. (Weiss, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC. (Weiss, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36369095 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Williams International Co., LLC. (Attorney David Evan Weiss added to party Williams International Co., LLC(pty:pla))(Weiss, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.