BirdDog Technology Limited et al v. 2082 Technology, LLC et al
| BirdDog Technology Limited and BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd. |
| 2082 Technology, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Bolin Technology, Hoi Kyle Lo and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv09416 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. At the court's own motion, the hearing re: the APPLICATIONS for Writ of Right to Attach Order (Dkts. #24 & #25 ) scheduled for Tuesday, January 30, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. PT (Dkt. #31 ) will be held by video using Zoom. The steps to access the Zoom webinar are available on Judge Rosenberg's Procedures & Schedules page (www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-alicia-g-rosenberg). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kl) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 31
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATIONS FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDERS AND WRITS OF ATTACHEMTN by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #24 APPLICATION for Writ; granting #25 APPLICATION for Writ. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Applications shall be heard on January 30, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom 550 of the above entitled court; Defendants' opposition papers to the Application shall be due by January 9, 2024; and Plaintiffs' reply papers in support of the Applications shall be due by January 16, 2024. (et)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC, Hoi Kyle Lo, identifying BIRDDOG TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, BIRDDOG AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, 2082 TECHNOLOGY, LLC DBA BOLIN TECHNOLOGY, and HOI KYLE LO. (Magnuson, Molly) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #27 DEFENDANTS AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT filed by Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC, Hoi Kyle Lo. Motion set for hearing on 2/5/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder. (Magnuson, Molly) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. The Motion notices and sets the hearing for 2/5/2024 at 1:30 PM. Judge Snyder hears civil motions on Mondays at 10:00 AM. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC, Hoi Kyle Lo. Motion set for hearing on 2/5/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Christina A. Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Molly J. Magnuson, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Proposed Order) (Magnuson, Molly) |
| Filing 26 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Applications for Right to Attach Orders and Writs of Attachments from January 15, 2024 to January 30, 2024 filed by Plaintiff BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., BirdDog Technology Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Continuance of Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Applications for Right to Attach Orders & Writs of Attachment)(Huey, Brian Gabriel) |
| Filing 25 APPLICATION for Writ of Right to Attach Order [Bolin Technology] filed by Plaintiffs BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., BirdDog Technology Limited. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Attachment (Bolin), #2 Memorandum (MPA in Support of Application), #3 Redacted Document (Decl. of Barry Calnon), #4 Redacted Document (Calnon Exhibits), #5 Declaration (of Dan Miall), #6 Declaration (of David Cogan), #7 Declaration (of Ryan Keech), #8 Exhibit (Exhibits to Keech Decl.), #9 Proposed Order (Right to Attach Order), #10 (Writ of Attachment)) (Sullivan, Kevin) |
| Filing 24 APPLICATION for Writ of Right to Attach Order filed by Plaintiffs' BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., BirdDog Technology Limited. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Attachment, #2 Memorandum (MPA in Support of Application), #3 Redacted Document (Decl. of Barry Calnon), #4 Redacted Document (Calnon Exhibits), #5 Declaration (of Dan Miall), #6 Declaration (of David Cogan), #7 Declaration (of Ryan Keech), #8 Exhibit (Exhibits to Keech Decl.), #9 Proposed Order (Right to Attach Order), #10 (Writ of Attachment)) (Sullivan, Kevin) |
| Filing 23 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Barry Calnon Decl. along with Exhibits thereto under seal #22 filed by Plaintiff BirdDog Technology Limited. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document (Unredacted Decl. of Barry Calnon), #2 Unredacted Document (Unredacted Exhibits A-H to Calnon Decl.))(Sullivan, Kevin) |
| Filing 22 APPLICATION to file document Barry Calnon Decl. along with Exhibits thereto under seal filed by Plaintiff BirdDog Technology Limited. (Attachments: #1 Redacted Document (Redacted Decl. of Barry Calnon), #2 Redacted Document (Redacted Exhibits A-H to Calnon Decl.), #3 Proposed Order (Granting Application to File Under Seal))(Sullivan, Kevin) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, #17 , by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court, having considered the parties' stipulation, and finding good cause, hereby approves the stipulation, and Orders that Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC dba Bolin Technology and Hoi "Kyle" Lo shall have through and including December 22, 2023 to respond to the Complaint.IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-093416 CAS(AGRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff BirdDog Technology Limited, BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., upon Defendant Hoi Kyle Lo acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/27/2023, answer due 12/22/2023. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Dean Zipser, Attorney for Defendant. (Sullivan, Kevin) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Hoi Kyle Lo answer now due 12/22/2023; 2082 Technology, LLC answer now due 12/22/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Hoi Kyle Lo; 2082 Technology, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Magnuson, Molly) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Molly J Magnuson counsel for Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC, Hoi Kyle Lo. Adding Molly J. Magnuson as counsel of record for Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC dba Bolin Technology and Hoi Kyle Lo for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC dba Bolin Technology and Hoi Kyle Lo. (Attorney Molly J Magnuson added to party 2082 Technology, LLC (pty:dft), Attorney Molly J Magnuson added to party Hoi Kyle Lo(pty:dft))(Magnuson, Molly) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Dean J. Zipser counsel for Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC, Hoi Kyle Lo. Adding Dean J. Zipser as counsel of record for Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC dba Bolin Technology and Hoi Kyle Lo for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants 2082 Technology, LLC dba Bolin Technology and Hoi Kyle Lo. (Attorney Dean J. Zipser added to party 2082 Technology, LLC (pty:dft), Attorney Dean J. Zipser added to party Hoi Kyle Lo(pty:dft))(Zipser, Dean) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BirdDog Technology Limited, upon Defendant 2082 Technology, LLC served on 11/13/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Zhen Lin, Office Manager in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Sullivan, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, Summons Request, #4 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Item 2 is a Civil Cover sheet which was filed under the wrong event. Item 4 is a summons which was filed under the wrong event. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. It is noted that Counsel has now e-filed the documents under the correct event. (car) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Hoi Kyle Lo. (car) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant 2082 Technology, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., BirdDogTechnology Limited. (Keech, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., BirdDogTechnology Limited. (Keech, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., BirdDogTechnology Limited. (Keech, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BirdDogTechnology Limited, BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd., upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Plaintiffs', Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BirdDogTechnology Limited, BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd.. (Keech, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying BirdDog Technology Limited. (Keech, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 11/07/2023,, filed by Plaintiff BirdDogTechnology Limited, BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd..(Keech, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36369788 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff BirdDogTechnology Limited, BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd.. (Attorney Ryan Q Keech added to party BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Ryan Q Keech added to party BirdDogTechnology Limited(pty:pla))(Keech, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
