Evelyn Martinez v. City of Los Angeles
| Evelyn Martinez |
| City of Los Angeles |
| 2:2023cv09417 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ( NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Court finds that the party who filed the Request:has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: Plaintiff did not answer questions 1 and 2 or state that neither question is applicable. In response to Question 5, Plaintiff provided information about her financing of vehicles, which is also reflected in her response to Question 8, but not of their approximate value. The information Plaintiff provides about her income and expenses in response to Questions 3 and 6 is difficult to decipher and needs to be set forth more clearly and legibly so the Court may determine whether Plaintiff can pay the filing fees "and still afford the necessities of life." As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED #2 because The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiff must file an amended complaint and amended request to proceed in forma pauperis. If the filer does not comply with these instructions within 30 days, this case will be DISMISSED without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Referred) #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION To Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees of Costs filed by Plaintiff Evelyn Martinez. (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant City of Los Angeles Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi., filed by Plaintiff Evelyn Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evelyn Martinez v. City of Los Angeles | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evelyn Martinez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Los Angeles | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
