Michael Zinna v. Charles Newmark
| Michael Zinna |
| Charles Newmark |
| 2:2023cv09418 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Michael Zinna. (Chung, Cecilia) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Michael Zinna. upon Charles Newmark waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Charles Newmark. (Chung, Cecilia) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Charles Newmark. (lc) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #2 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #9 filed by plaintiff Michael Zinna. (Chung, Cecilia) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (sh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Zinna. (Chung, Cecilia) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Zinna, (Chung, Cecilia) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Michael Zinna. (Chung, Cecilia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36370101 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Michael Zinna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment A) (Attorney Cecilia Sunah Chung added to party Michael Zinna(pty:pla))(Chung, Cecilia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael Zinna v. Charles Newmark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Zinna | |
| Represented By: | Cecilia Sunah Chung |
| Represented By: | Derek Linke |
| Represented By: | Derek A. Newman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charles Newmark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
