Brinda Chenette v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
| BRINDA CHENETTE |
| PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD., and Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. |
| 2:2023cv09423 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| George H Wu |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for January 18, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than January 11, 2024. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco)
|
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lisa M Conner counsel for Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. Adding Lisa Marie Conner as counsel of record for Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. (Attorney Lisa M Conner added to party Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Conner, Lisa) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE AND CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., identifying Carnival Corporation & plc. (Manasantivongs, Alisa) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd..(Attorney Alisa Manasantivongs added to party Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Manasantivongs, Alisa) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brinda Chenette, upon Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. served on 11/15/2023, answer due 12/6/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Finklehoffe, Carol) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BRINDA CHENETTE. (Finklehoffe, Carol) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff BRINDA CHENETTE (Finklehoffe, Carol) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BRINDA CHENETTE. (Finklehoffe, Carol) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36371519 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff BRINDA CHENETTE. (Attorney Carol Lynn Finklehoffe added to party BRINDA CHENETTE(pty:pla))(Finklehoffe, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
