Benjamin Steven Koch v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Benjamin Steven Koch |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Children and Family Services, AFSOUM ZARRAABIAN, Nenita Bulandus, TAMEKA DAIRE, Nicole Lavin, CATHERINE VUKSANPVIC, Preston Oppenheimer, Donna Buckley and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv09444 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Schedule of Pre-Trial Date Worksheet)(Davis, Vincent) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Docket text and document conflict; re party. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Withdrawal of Reply (Motion related) #12 filed by PLAINTIFF Benjamin Steven Koch. (Davis, Vincent) |
| Filing 12 REPLY stipulation to Continue Court Deadlines Declaration of Eri Diaz Aguilar filed by Plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch. (Davis, Vincent) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Vincent Walter Davis counsel for Plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch. Adding Eri Diaz Aguilar as counsel of record for Benjamin Steven Koch for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Attorney Eri Diaz Aguilar. (Davis, Vincent) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Edna Valledor Wenning counsel for Plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch. Edna V Wenning is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by counsel Edna Wenning. (Wenning, Edna) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 1/22/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Brenner, Anita) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Donna Buckley, Nenita Bulandus, County of Los Angeles, Tameka Daire, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Nicole Lavin, Preston Oppenheimer, Catherine Vuksanpvic, Afsoum Zarraabian. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/12/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 10/23/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jimmy Prieto, Deputy Clerk, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/31/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 11) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Benjamin Steven Koch, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maile 'Doe", Authorized to Accept, Hispanic, Female, Age:30's, Hair:Black, Height: 5'5", Weight 160 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/31/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 12) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, identifying Benjamin Steven Kock, County of Los Angeles, Department of Children and Family Services, Afsoum Zarraabian, Nenita Bulandus, Tameka Daire, Nicole Lavin, Catherine Vuksanpvic, Preston Oppenheimer, Donna Buckley. (Brenner, Anita) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV10779 Receipt No: ACACDC-36374131 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3-Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location, #4 Exhibit 4- ADR Packet, #5 Exhibit 5- Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit 6-First Amended General Order, #7 Exhibit 7-Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulation Packet, #8 Exhibit 8-Notice of Case Management Conference, #9 Exhibit 9-Summons on Complaint, #10 Exhibit 10-Minute Order, #11 Exhibit 11-Proof of Service, #12 Exhibit 12-Proof of Service) (Attorney Anita S Brenner added to party COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:dft))(Brenner, Anita) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Brenner, Anita) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
