Andrian Corralez v. Target Corporation
Adrian Corralez and A.C. |
TARGET CORPORATION and DOES 1 to 50 inclusive |
2:2023cv09532 |
November 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Wesley L Hsu |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 STANDING ORDER FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 22 CIVIL PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Scheduling Conference scheduled for 1/5/2024 is hereby VACATED. The pretrial schedule governing this case is set forth in the far right column labeled "Court Order" located on the parties' Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet, which accompanies this Order. If the parties wish to set additional or alternative dates, they must file a stipulation and proposed order setting forth the dates requested and demonstrating good cause. Setting additional or alternative dates may be especially appropriate in class actions, patent cases, or cases for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). Please refer to the Court's Standing Order for Newly Assigned Civil Cases for requirements for specific motions, discovery, certain types of filings, courtesy copies, emailing signature items to chambers, settlement, and other matters pertaining to all civil cases. Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2025 03:00 PM; Jury Trial set for 1/21/2025 09:00 AM. See order for additional deadlines and information. (lom) |
Filing 21 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 11/29/24. (hc) |
Filing 20 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Substitute Johnny Ioannis, Maritza Bartez, and Gabe Cordova for Defendants DOE 1, DOE 2, and DOE 3 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 filed by Plaintiff A.C.. (Saeedian, Michael) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Substitute Johnny Ioannis, Maritza Bartez, and Gabe Cordova for Defendants DOE 1, DOE 2, and DOE 3 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Kolesnikov, Yury) |
Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Attachments: #1 Worksheet)(Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Yury A Kolesnikov counsel for Defendant Target Corporation. Adding Yury A. Kolesnikov as counsel of record for Defendant, Target Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attorney Yury A Kolesnikov added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Kolesnikov, Yury) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Substitute Johnny Ioannis, Maritza Bartez, and Gabe Cordova for Defendants DOE 1, DOE 2, and DOE 3 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff A.C. A.C.. Motion set for hearing on 1/12/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Substitute Party and Remand, #2 Declaration of Michael Saeedian ISO Motion to Substitute Party and Remand, #3 Appendix Proposed First Amended Complaint, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Amend to Substitute Party and Remand) (Saeedian, Michael) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN E-FILED DOCUMENT AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion to Substitute Party (Nondiverse) and Remand to State Court. (DKT. #11 ) by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court hereby orders the motion stricken for failure to set a hearing date and it fails to adhere to the Local Rules and/or the Court's Standing Order. (hc) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Memorandum in Support of Motion, #11 , Motion to Substitute Party and Remand to State Court #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests-Substitute Party, Remand Case to State Court. Other error(s) with document(s): Noticed motion hearing date is not indicated in the docket entry text or directly below the caption of attached document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael Saeedian counsel for Plaintiff A.C.. Daniella Saeedian is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff A.C. (Saeedian, Michael) |
Filing 12 Notice filed by Plaintiff A.C.. Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Substitute Party (Nondiverse) and Remand to State Court (Saeedian, Michael) |
Filing 11 (STRICKEN ON 12/11/2023 PER DOCKET NO. 15) MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion to Substitute Party (Nondiverse) and Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff A.C.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ISO Plaintiff's Motion, #2 Appendix Proposed First Amended Complaint, #3 Proposed Order)(Attorney Michael Saeedian added to party A.C.(pty:pla))(Saeedian, Michael) Modified on 12/11/2023 (hc). |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. A Scheduling Conference is set for 1/5/2024 at 01:00 PM. See Attached Order for Details. (hc) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE WESLEY L. HSU. (hc) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Target Corporation in Los Angeles Superior Court on 9/15/2023, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff A.C. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12/1/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, re Notice (Other) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 11/10/2023. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 3 Notice filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. Notice to Adverse Party of Filing Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court [28 USC Section 1441(b)(1)] (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22CHCV01271 Receipt No: ACACDC-36388216 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Attorney Gabrielle A Pedone added to party TARGET CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.