Joshua Cuevas v. Maria Ramirez et al
| Joshua Cuevas |
| Maria Ramirez doing business as Las Delicias De Pueblo, Bobby J. Mclain and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv09583 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bobby J. Mclain answer now due 2/1/2024; Maria Ramirez answer now due 1/27/2024, filed by Attorney for Defendants Bobby J. Mclain; Maria Ramirez.(Attorney Dan Tudor Danet added to party Bobby J. Mclain(pty:dft), Attorney Dan Tudor Danet added to party Maria Ramirez(pty:dft))(Danet, Dan) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevas, upon Defendant Bobby J. Mclain served on 12/10/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bobby J. McLain, As Trustee of The McLain Family Trust, defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevas, upon Defendant Maria Ramirez served on 12/7/2023, answer due 12/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maria Ramirez D/B/A Las Delicias De Pueblo, DEFENDANT in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 13
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (See document for further details) (aco)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevasto Order to Show Cause #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than November 29, 2023. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bobby J. Mclain, Maria Ramirez. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Joshua Cuevas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-36394174 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Joshua Cuevas(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
