Kevork Turabian v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al
Plaintiff: Kevork Turabian
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, LAD-MB LLC and Does 1 through 30, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv09629
Filed: November 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Consuelo B Marshall
Referring Judge: A Joel Richlin
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. In light of the notice of settlement, filed January 4, 2024 #11 , indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. By APRIL 23, 2024 the parties shall file either a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment. Failure to timely file a stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment shall result in the dismissal of thisaction. (lom)
January 4, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Kevork Turabian. (Margarian, Hovanes)
December 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC AND LAD-MB,LLCS TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT #8 , by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to January 11, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
December 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. See order for details. (ys)
December 21, 2023 Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 1/11/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant LAD-MB LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gallagher, Mehgan)
November 21, 2023 Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to LAD-MB LLC answer now due 12/21/2023; Mercedes-Benz USA LLC answer now due 12/21/2023, filed by Defendant LAD-MB LLC; Mercedes-Benz USA LLC.(Gallagher, Mehgan)
November 16, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
November 16, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (lh)
November 14, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, LAD-MB LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Kevork Turabian. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/16/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
November 14, 2023 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants LAD-MB LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
November 14, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant LAD-MB LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, identifying Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz Group, Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation, Corporate Parent Daimler International Nederland B.V. for Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
November 14, 2023 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC identifying Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz Group, Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation, Corporate Parent Daimler International Nederland B.V. for Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
November 14, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV25163 Receipt No: ACACDC-36402603 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant LAD-MB LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party LAD-MB LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kevork Turabian v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevork Turabian
Represented By: Hovanes Margarian
Represented By: Armen Margarian
Represented By: Shushanik Margarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Represented By: Soheyl Tahsildoost
Represented By: Mehgan Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAD-MB LLC
Represented By: Soheyl Tahsildoost
Represented By: Mehgan Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 30, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?