Peter Ju Ho Yun v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. et al
Peter Ju Ho Yun |
Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. and Does 1 through 20, Inclusive |
2:2023cv09667 |
November 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Michael R Wilner |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Hyunki Jung on behalf of Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. (Attorney Hyunki Jung added to party Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc.(pty:dft))(Jung, Hyunki) |
Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-09667 SPG(MRWx). (rn) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc., re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 served on November 16, 2023. (Cook, Collin) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT 11/14/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE DECLARATION of Collin D. Cook #4 ](sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Peter Ju Ho Yun.[FILED IN STATE COURT 10/12/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE DECLARATION of Collin D. Cook #4 ] (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, identifying Konica Minolta Holdings U.S.A., Inc.. (Cook, Collin) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Collin D. Cook re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.'s Petition and Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332 filed by Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Cook, Collin) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Audrey Mojica re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.'s Petition and Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332 filed by Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Cook, Collin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc.. (Cook, Collin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles - Central District, case number 23STCV24907 Receipt No: ACACDC-36408086 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc.. (Attorney Collin D Cook added to party Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc.(pty:dft))(Cook, Collin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.