Andrew S. Kindle v. Vanderlande Industries Inc.
Andrew S. Kindle |
Vanderlande Industries Inc. |
2:2023cv09738 |
November 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vanderlande Industries Inc. answer now due 1/24/2024, filed by Defendant Vanderlande Industries Inc..(Attorney Ryan William Jebreil added to party Vanderlande Industries Inc.(pty:dft))(Jebreil, Ryan) |
Filing 9 INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, re Complaint #1 and Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #6 (dc) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Andrew S. Kindle, served on 12/19/2023. (et) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (lom) |
Filing 6 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #4 by Judge David O. Carter. Granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (rolm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Andrew S. Kindle. (sh) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Andrew S. Kindle. (sh) |
Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Andrew S. Kindle, (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Vanderlande Industries Inc. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Andrew S. Kindle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Andrew S. Kindle v. Vanderlande Industries Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew S. Kindle | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vanderlande Industries Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ryan William Jebreil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.